Subject: I must be a Shining Wit! (and not a whining shit)
From: WWS
Newsgroups: alt.fan.tom-servo
Date: 24 Jun 1998
Message-ID: <35908DFB.65414BF9@tyler.net>
Captain Infinity wrote:
> Reverend Sean O'Hara has a bit of fun with "followup to". LOL! Well, with
> all the "redirecting groups" discussion going on, it was bound to happen.
> Too bad Fossan is so dry. Normally I'd pass it by. BUT NOT THIS TIME!
>
> THIS TIME IT'S A CONTEST!
I like contests!
>
> The first person to wackylace Fossan's post with all the following words
> wins an autographed box of fresh purple Peeps! Second prize is a semi-fresh
> Giant Yellow Bunny! [1]
>
> Rutabaga
> Videotape
> Fossilized
> BUTTER! <---must be capitalized and punctuated as shown
> Child-proof cap
> Philtrum [2]
>
> OK, everybody start writing...NOW!
>
First off, for Extra Credit, I used a different and longer Fossan post.
It had already caught my eye. Well, so maybe that disqualifies me.
Who wants those nasty old purple peeps anyway? (I do, that's who!)
This came out of the "Centauri Moon" thread, and it's posted in its
proper place on rastb5. So, sirs, how do you like it?
>Then could you kindly refute the theory that Earth's moon was captured quite
intact by aliens and transferred to Centauri prime for some photo ops
>some time ago? Or perhaps it just magically appeared? In any event, Earth
is no place for someone with your unique blend of body odors, even if it
>has a moon. Agreed? There must be SOME cosmological event that explains
rutabagas, they could NOT have appeared by accident. I know that you know
>this, right? Now, can you tell me exactly how probable this event is? No?
Well I think it means there are Amazon Women on Every Earth type Moon!
>What percentage of known Earthlike planets possess a moon like ours? 100%!
What percentage of Moons have a planet that looks like a Rutabaga? None!
>Of course, when you only have one sample, you have zero degrees of freedom,
and freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose. Zero is zero,
>and your probability of error is infinite, so the probabilty of an
ancient fossilized Peep with telepathic powers being found alive on an
>Earth-like planet having a Moon-like moon must be somewhere greater than
your chances of opening a child proof cap on the first try. I invented
>zero (or we wouldn't have one) up to one (all Earth-like planets have a
self appointed genius like me on them. I was the one who insisted on a
>Moon-like moon). So, why is JMS so off the mark by assuming that another
Videotape of him in his boxer shorts will determine whether a vaguely
>(more-or-less) Earth-like planet has an Earth-like moon?
>And, please cite facts, extrapolations of fact, and logical consquences of
screaming BUTTER! BUTTER! BUTTER! at a margarine convention! I believe in
>fact, not snide remarks and personal attacks. You obviously CAN cite facts
that show I am lying through my teeth, and up my Philtrum. French kiss me
>when you need to, so, if you don't, I'll assume you can't.
--
<*>
__________________________________________________WWS_____________
WE HAVE A WINNAH!!!!
Web site contents are Copyright © Captain Infinity Productions.
All Usenet posts reproduced herein are the copyrighted intellectual property of the poster named in the "From" header.